![]() ![]() The Finding of Probable Cause also asserted that Academy “failed to articulate a legitimate reason for why it required Complainant to immediately produce a new (medical) certification or face termination” and held that there was “reasonable suspicion” to suggest Academy’s unyielding stance was intended to “discourage and impede” the driver from taking additional FLA time. The driver filed a formal complaint with DCR in July 2018.įollowing an investigation, the division issued a Finding of Probable Cause in April 2020.ĭCR found that the original medical certification provided by the driver in 2017 was “sufficient under the FLA’s enforcing regulations.”ĭCR also found that the driver’s request for a fourth period of intermittent leave to care for his father met the “emergent circumstances” provision of the FLA, and was therefore not subject to the law’s normal advance-notice requirement. The driver told DCR he intended to provide an updated medical certificate once a treatment plan was determined.Īfter the driver departed for North Carolina to be with his father, he received word that his employment had been terminated for not providing the updated medical certificate, and for failing to provide sufficient advance notice of his leave. The employee responded that he was unable to provide an updated medical certificate, because the gravity of his father’s deteriorating condition was still being assessed. When the employee subsequently asked for a fourth intermittent leave period, from Decemthrough January 4, 2018, the company demanded he provide an updated medical certificate before commencing leave. The driver supported his request for the first two leave periods with a medical certificate provided by his father’s treating physician, but did not comply when Academy requested an updated medical certificate to support his taking the third intermittent leave period. The December 2017 intermittent leave period was the fourth such leave period the driver had taken to care for his father, who was diagnosed as terminally ill with leukemia. ![]() “The law allows for the uncertainties that can arise when a family member suffers from a serious medical condition, and prohibits an employer from denying leave in emergent circumstances or using the certification requirements to harass, intimidate or otherwise discourage an employee from requesting leave.” “This case illustrates the importance of the protections offered by the FLA when an employee is required to provide a medical certification,” added Deputy Director of the Division on Civil Rights Rosemary DiSavino. ![]() In some situations, the employer may require advance notice and a certification from a health care provider to support a leave request. The FLA allows employees to take intermittent leave in certain circumstances. Intermittent leave is defined in the FLA as leave “taken in separate periods of time,” where each leave period spans at least one work week. ![]() We are committed to ensuring that workers don’t lose their jobs in violation of the law just because a family member gets sick.”Īccording to the New Jersey Division of Civil Right’s investigation, Hoboken-based Academy fired the complainant in December 2017 after he began a four-week “intermittent leave” period to care for his ailing father in North Carolina. “The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored just how important those protections are. “New Jersey law protects workers’ ability to take time off to care for a seriously ill family member,” said Acting Attorney General Andrew Bruck. Academy Lines LLC, better known as Academy Bus, must pay a former bus driver $40,000 and arrange for anti-discrimination training after firing him for taking leave to care for his dying father. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |